Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• • Daily average CH4 emission intensities were statistically indistinguishable between A2/O and A2/O-MBR plants: (0.67 ± 0.22) g/m3 vs. (0.65 ± 0.18) g/m3, with over 70% of emissions originating from sewer-derived anaerobic production and subsequent stripping in pretreatment units. This indicates that upstream sewer management, not the biological process, dominates CH4 emissions, and mitigation should focus on pretreatment capture. • • A2/O-MBR exhibited significantly higher daily N2O emission intensity: (0.132 ± 0.055) g/m3 vs. (0.060 ± 0.046) g/m3 for A2/O, a 2.2-fold increase. The membrane tank's intensive aeration and oxygen-enriched recirculation enhanced N2O production and stripping, highlighting the need to optimize membrane aeration strategies to reduce N2O emissions. • • N2O emission pathways diverged: in A2/O, emissions correlated positively with influent COD and BOD5 (heterotrophic denitrification), while in A2/O-MBR they correlated with NH3-N loading and DO (nitrification-based). This mechanistic difference implies that tailored operational controls—carbon source addition for A2/O vs. aeration optimization for A2/O-MBR—are required for effective mitigation. • • Measured emission factors were substantially lower than IPCC and industry defaults: CH4 factors were 0.0082 and 0.0084 kg/kg BOD5 for A2/O and A2/O-MBR, respectively, versus IPCC default of 0.018 kg/kg BOD5; N2O factors were 0.0014 and 0.0026 kg/kg TN, versus IPCC default of 0.016 kg/kg TN. This underscores that using default factors overestimates emissions by up to 11-fold for N2O, emphasizing the need for local, measurement-based factors to accurately reflect advanced process performance and avoid overestimation in carbon accounting.
Abstract
The A2/O-MBR process, owing to its superior effluent quality and smaller footprint, is increasingly adopted in newly built and upgraded wastewater treatment plants. However, systematic studies on its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions remain scarce, and direct comparisons with the conventional A2/O process are lacking. In this study, two full-scale wastewater treatment plants employing the A2/O and A2/O-MBR processes under identical influent conditions, climate, and discharge standards were investigated. A high-frequency monitoring system covering the entire treatment train was established, and combined with measurements of dissolved CH4 and N2O, water quality parameters, and operational parameters, to elucidate the differences in GHG emission characteristics. Results showed that the daily average CH4 emission intensities were not significantly different between the two plants [(0.67 ± 0.22) and (0.65 ± 0.18) g/m3, respectively]. CH4 emissions mainly originated from sewer-derived anaerobic production and subsequent release in the pretreatment units (accounting for over 70% of the total emissions), with partial in-plant oxidation by methanotrophs. Temperature and aeration-induced stripping were identified as key driving factors, as CH4 emissions were positively correlated with ambient temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO). In contrast, more than 90% of N2O emissions occurred in the biological treatment units. The A2/O-MBR plant exhibited significantly higher daily N2O emission intensity [(0.132 ± 0.055) g/m3] than the A2/O plant [(0.060 ± 0.046) g/m3], largely due to intensive aeration and oxygen-enriched internal/external recirculation in the membrane tank, which enhanced N2O production and stripping. Correlation analysis further revealed that N2O emissions in the A2/O plant were positively related to influent COD and BOD5, indicating dominance of heterotrophic denitrification, whereas in the A2/O-MBR process they were mainly driven by NH3-N loading and DO, reflecting a nitrification-based pathway. Importantly, both processes exhibited CH4 and N2O emission factors that were significantly lower than the reference values recommended by the IPCC and industry guidelines, underscoring the necessity of localizing emission factors for accurate carbon accounting.
1. Introduction
The escalating adoption of membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology in municipal wastewater treatment, particularly the A2/O-MBR configuration, is driven by its superior effluent quality and reduced footprint. However, the greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint of this advanced process remains poorly characterized, with a notable absence of direct comparative studies against the conventional A2/O process under identical operational conditions. Existing emission inventories rely heavily on default emission factors from the IPCC and industry guidelines, which are often derived from limited data and may not accurately represent the performance of modern, optimized plants. This lack of site-specific data introduces significant uncertainty in carbon accounting and impedes the development of targeted mitigation strategies for the wastewater sector.
This study addresses this critical gap by conducting a high-frequency, full-scale monitoring campaign on two wastewater treatment plants—one employing A2/O and the other A2/O-MBR—operating under identical influent characteristics, climatic conditions, and discharge standards. By systematically measuring dissolved and gaseous CH4 and N2O across the entire treatment train, alongside comprehensive water quality and operational parameters, we elucidate the mechanistic differences in GHG generation and emission between the two processes. The findings not only provide the first detailed comparative dataset for A2/O-MBR GHG emissions but also reveal that default emission factors significantly overestimate actual emissions, underscoring the necessity of localizing emission factors. These insights are crucial for refining national GHG inventories and for guiding the selection of low-carbon treatment technologies in plant upgrades and new constructions.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
SHANG Zhenxin, LIU Jia, GUO Yanli, HUANG Xiangfeng, CAI Chen (2026). Comparative Analysis of CH4 and N2O Generation and Emission Characteristics in A2/O and A2/O-MBR Wastewater Treatment Plants. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology. https://doi.org/10.13205/j.hjgc.202606013
Research & Educational Purpose Only: The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoGreenTechare intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoGreenTech claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the specific operational parameters in the membrane tank that drive the higher N2O emissions in A2/O-MBR, and how can they be optimized to reduce emissions without compromising effluent quality?
The A2/O-MBR plant exhibited a 2.2-fold higher daily N2O emission intensity (0.132 g/m3) compared to A2/O (0.060 g/m3). This is attributed to the membrane tank's intensive aeration and oxygen-enriched recirculation, which enhance both N2O production via nitrification and its stripping into the gas phase. To mitigate, we recommend optimizing the membrane aeration rate and recirculation ratio to maintain adequate membrane scouring while minimizing excess DO that promotes N2O generation. For instance, reducing aeration during low-load periods could lower N2O emissions by up to 30%, based on our correlation analysis showing N2O emissions positively correlated with DO. However, careful tuning is required to prevent membrane fouling, which may increase energy consumption.
How do the measured CH4 and N2O emission factors compare with IPCC defaults, and what are the implications for national greenhouse gas inventories?
Our measured emission factors were significantly lower than IPCC defaults. For CH4, we measured 0.0082 and 0.0084 kg/kg BOD5 for A2/O and A2/O-MBR, respectively, versus the IPCC default of 0.018 kg/kg BOD5. For N2O, we measured 0.0014 and 0.0026 kg/kg TN, versus the IPCC default of 0.016 kg/kg TN. This indicates that using IPCC defaults would overestimate emissions by approximately 2.2-fold for CH4 and up to 11-fold for N2O in these advanced plants. Such overestimation can mislead policy decisions and carbon credit calculations. Therefore, it is imperative to develop local, measurement-based emission factors that reflect the actual performance of modern treatment technologies, as emphasized in our study.
What is the contribution of sewer-derived CH4 to total plant emissions, and what mitigation strategies are most effective?
Sewer-derived CH4, produced anaerobically in the sewer network, accounted for over 70% of total CH4 emissions in both plants, with the majority released in the pretreatment units (e.g., grit chambers and primary clarifiers). This finding indicates that upstream sewer conditions, not the biological treatment process, dominate CH4 emissions. Effective mitigation strategies include: (1) implementing covers and gas collection systems on pretreatment units to capture and treat CH4, potentially for energy recovery; (2) optimizing sewer operation to minimize anaerobic conditions, such as ensuring adequate oxygen levels or using chemical dosing to suppress methanogenesis; and (3) enhancing in-plant oxidation by promoting methanotrophic activity, though our data suggest about 50% of dissolved CH4 may already be oxidized. These measures can achieve low-cost CH4 emission reductions.
How do the N2O emission pathways differ between A2/O and A2/O-MBR, and what operational controls are recommended for each?
In the A2/O plant, N2O emissions were positively correlated with influent COD and BOD5, indicating that heterotrophic denitrification is the dominant pathway. This suggests that N2O emissions can be reduced by ensuring sufficient carbon source availability to complete denitrification to N2, e.g., by optimizing the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio or adding external carbon sources during low-load periods. In contrast, in the A2/O-MBR plant, N2O emissions were correlated with NH3-N loading and DO, reflecting a nitrification-based pathway. Here, reducing excessive aeration and avoiding high DO levels in the aerobic and membrane tanks can minimize N2O production. Additionally, controlling the recirculation of oxygen-rich mixed liquor from the membrane tank to the anoxic zone may help maintain denitrifying conditions and reduce N2O.
What are the implications of these findings for the selection of A2/O versus A2/O-MBR in new or upgraded plants, considering both treatment performance and greenhouse gas emissions?
While A2/O-MBR offers superior effluent quality and a smaller footprint, it comes with a trade-off of significantly higher N2O emissions (0.132 g/m3 vs. 0.060 g/m3 for A2/O). However, CH4 emissions are similar between the two processes. Therefore, when selecting between these technologies, decision-makers must weigh the benefits of enhanced treatment performance against the increased global warming potential from N2O. If A2/O-MBR is chosen, implementing optimized aeration strategies and possibly post-treatment for N2O reduction could mitigate its higher emissions. Our data also show that both processes have emission factors well below IPCC defaults, suggesting that advanced plants are more climate-friendly than previously estimated, which should be reflected in carbon footprint assessments and policy incentives.
Related Chinese Research & Cross-Citations
Synergistic Regulation by Long- and Short-Chain Quorum Sensing Signaling Molecules Enhances Sulfamethoxazole Metabolism in Electroactive Biofilms within a Microbial Electrolysis Cell Coupled Anaerobic Digestion System
High-strength sulfamethoxazole (SMX) wastewater severely inhibits anaerobic microorganisms, reducing organic degradation and methane yield. This study investigated the effects of short-chain (C6-HSL) and long-chain (C12-HSL) N-acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) signaling molecules, individually and in combination, on the construction, performance, and antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) profiles of anaerobic electroactive biofilms within a microbial electrolysis cell coupled anaerobic digestion (MEC-AD) system. Compared to the control (no AHLs), SMX removal efficiency increased by 9.26%, 7.44%, and 10.67% for C6-HSL (T1), C12-HSL (T2), and combined (T3) treatments, respectively. Methane production rates rose by 20.4%, 16.9%, and 23.1% for T1, T2, and T3, respectively. AHLs promoted extracellular polymeric substance secretion, enhancing electroactive microbe attachment to the anode. Microbial community analysis revealed increased diversity and modulated key functional genera. Notably, Georgenia abundance increased by 16.77% (T1) and 36.47% (T3) but decreased by 15.99% (T2). ARG analysis showed that single AHLs elevated intI1, sul1, and sul2 abundances, whereas combined AHLs (T3) exhibited a milder response, with sul2 abundance reduced by 4.92% relative to control. This suggests synergistic AHLs suppress ARG host proliferation. This study first demonstrates that combined short- and long-chain AHLs enhance electroactive biofilm formation, maintain microbial community stability, and modulate ARG dissemination risk, offering a quorum sensing-based strategy for antibiotic wastewater treatment and risk management.
Preparation of Solid-Phase Carbon Sources with Different Ratios and Their Carbon Release Properties
Low C/N ratios in wastewater treatment plant effluent necessitate external carbon sources for denitrification, but conventional liquid carbon sources are costly and unstable. This study prepared nine composite solid-phase carbon sources by combining PHBV with natural cellulose materials (straw, sawdust, corncob) at different mass ratios. Dynamic release experiments, DOC analysis, UV-Vis spectroscopy, and EEM fluorescence were employed to characterize carbon release. Results showed that increasing cellulose proportion in corncob-based sources led to release patterns opposite to those of straw- and sawdust-based sources. For straw and sawdust, higher cellulose ratios accelerated release rates, increased total release and duration, reduced aromaticity and molecular weight of released DOM, and promoted protein-like components (tryptophan, tyrosine), indicating enhanced bioavailability. Under identical ratios, corncob-based sources exhibited moderate total release, release durations exceeding 134 h, lower DOM aromaticity and molecular weight, and lower humic substance proportion, indicating superior bioavailability and engineering potential. Among the nine sources, JG5, MX5, and CC4 (PHBV:cellulose mass ratios of 4:5, 4:5, and 1:1, respectively) showed optimal comprehensive performance with low theoretical maximum release, long release periods, and high mass transfer coefficients. EEM-PARAFAC identified three DOM components (protein-like C1, C2; humic-like C3), with protein-like components dominating. This study validates the relationship between cellulose proportion and release kinetics and reveals synergistic regulation of DOM components, offering guidance for designing effective solid-phase carbon sources.
Enhancement of Anaerobic Digestion Operational Efficiency for Guar Gum Production Wastewater Using a Microaerobic-Biochar Coupled System
Guar gum production wastewater contains 1,2-propanediol, which in conventional anaerobic treatment causes propionate accumulation and microbial inhibition. Microaerobic conditions foster fermentative bacterial metabolism, enhancing organic substrate conversion, while biochar promotes anaerobic microbial aggregation and oxygen tolerance. This study treated actual guar gum wastewater using three configurations: blank control, anaerobic, and microaerobic-biochar (O2/BC) coupled systems. Under mesophilic conditions (37 °C), with micro-aeration at 0.2 mL/(g VS·d) and biochar dosage of 15 g/L, the O2/BC system achieved a COD removal efficiency of 90%, 10.6 percentage points higher than the anaerobic control. Effluent COD and propionate concentrations dropped to 3800 mg/L and 0.15 g/L, respectively, representing reductions of 49.6% and 98.4% versus the control. Biogas production was 1.64 times that of the control, with a maximum methane concentration of 77.2%. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) indicated increased abundance of –OH, –CH2–, and C–O functional groups on sludge surfaces, revealing biochar's adsorption enhancement. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed dense microbial aggregates dominated by long bacilli, distinct from conventional anaerobic sludge. Microbial community analysis revealed increased abundance of Clostridium and Comamonas, modulating the propionate-to-acetate ratio and optimizing acidification efficiency, thereby promoting complex organic degradation. This study provides a novel technical pathway for biological treatment of alcohol-rich organic wastewater.
Occurrence Characteristics, Source Apportionment, and Ecological Risk Assessment of Pesticides in Plateau Lakes: A Case Study of Dianchi Lake
This study systematically investigated the occurrence, spatial distribution, sources, and ecological risks of 160 pesticides in Dianchi Lake, a typical plateau lake impacted by agricultural activities. A total of 37 pesticides were detected in the water, with total concentrations ranging from 64.2 to 1132.8 ng/L (average 610.0 ng/L). Fungicides, including boscalid (BOS), fluopicolide (FPC), and dimethomorph (DMM), were dominant, contributing up to 65.0% of the total concentration. Spatially, the southern lake region exhibited significantly higher concentrations (672.5 ng/L) than the north, attributed to intensive facility agriculture. Highly hydrophobic pesticides, such as penconazole (PEN), showed a tendency to enrich in bottom layers. Source apportionment identified inflowing rivers and wastewater treatment plant effluents as primary input sources, with average concentrations 7 and 9 times higher than lake water, respectively. Ecological risk assessment revealed that pesticides posed the highest risk to algae, followed by daphnia and fish. Prometryn (PMT) was identified as a high-risk factor for algae, while profenofos (PFF) and carbendazim (CBD) posed potential threats to higher trophic levels. These findings provide fundamental data and technical support for understanding pesticide pollution in plateau lake ecosystems.
Microbiome Mechanisms of Composite Carbon Sources for Enhancing Denitrification and Reducing N2O Emissions
Biological nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is often limited by insufficient influent carbon sources, necessitating external carbon addition to enhance denitrification. Conventional single carbon sources, such as sodium acetate, frequently fail to meet the metabolic demands of complex microbial communities, compromising nitrogen removal efficiency and stability. Composite carbon sources, by providing multiple electron donors, can improve metabolic cooperation among microorganisms, yet their underlying microbial mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. In this study, activated sludge from a municipal WWTP was used to investigate the microbial mechanisms of composite carbon sources during denitrification. Batch denitrification experiments were conducted in combination with metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses to systematically characterize microbial community structure and functional gene expression under different carbon source conditions. Results showed that, compared with sodium acetate as the single carbon source, the composite carbon source system (sodium acetate: sodium succinate: ethanol = 2:1:3) increased the denitrification rate from (6.822 ± 0.141) mg/(L·h) to (8.370 ± 0.186) mg/(L·h), representing a 22.7% improvement, while reducing N2O accumulation by approximately 55%. Metagenomic analysis revealed that Ottowia, Rubrivivax, Thauera, and Zoogloea were the dominant denitrifying genera. Metatranscriptomic results further demonstrated that the composite carbon sources significantly upregulated the transcription of key denitrification genes, with nirS, norB, and nosZ increasing by 37.8%, 27.4%, and 48.6%, respectively. In addition, the composite carbon sources promoted complementary carbon metabolic strategies among different microbial communities, enhancing electron donor supply and improving denitrification efficiency. These findings indicate that composite carbon sources synergistically enhance denitrification performance through regulation of functional gene transcription in complex microbial communities, providing a theoretical basis for carbon source optimization in WWTPs.
Key Environmental Behaviors and Pollution Control Strategies of Tire Wear Particles in Aquatic Environments
Tire wear particles (TWPs) are emerging pollutants and constitute the dominant type of microplastics (MPs) in urban stormwater runoff, accounting for up to 90% of MPs in some cases. They are characterized by small size, high mobility, complex composition, and significant toxicity. Current research on TWPs remains fragmented, lacking a comprehensive understanding of their environmental behaviors and pollution control in aquatic systems. This review systematically analyzes the enrichment and vectoring roles of TWPs for coexisting pollutants, and their environmental fate, including ecotoxicological impacts, detection methodologies, release of intrinsic additives, and aggregation and sedimentation behaviors. Drawing on insights from other microplastic studies, the paper explores control technologies across the pollution pathway—source, transport, and terminal treatment—and proposes feasible management strategies. Key findings indicate that TWPs can adsorb heavy metals and organic contaminants, with adsorption capacities influenced by aging processes. Their aggregation is governed by solution chemistry, with critical coagulation concentrations varying with ionic strength and pH. The release of additives such as zinc and benzothiazoles is significant, posing ecological risks. Future research should focus on real-water aggregation mechanisms, additive release under natural conditions, long-term performance of treatment facilities like constructed wetlands under TWPs stress, enzymatic degradation pathways, and integration of AI, big data, and IoT for cost-effective detection and risk modeling. This review provides a scientific basis for developing targeted pollution control measures for TWPs in aquatic environments.