SinoGreenTech Academic Portal
Official PDF TranslationEnvironmental Chemistry

Research Progress on Atmospheric Microplastics: Sampling, Analytical Methods, Occurrence, and Ecological Impacts

Authors: WANG Bo; WANG Kai; QU Kaijing; ZHANG Jinrui; LONG Xin; XU Li; HOU Junxian; LI Ben; PAN Xianhui; LI Xin; HU Junli; LIU Xuejun

DOI: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2025041502Status: Verified Translated Edition
Sponsored AdvertisementAd Placement Area
reCAPTCHA Bot Shield Active

Preparing Secure Academic Download

Verifying human reader & generating high-resolution document...

Verifying Document Integrity15s remaining
← Back to Article
Protected by Google reCAPTCHA v3.PrivacyTerms
Sponsored ContentAdSense In-Feed Ad Slot

Key Findings in This Report

• • Atmospheric MPs predominantly measure <700 μm, with fibrous shapes dominating; this size fraction is inhalable and can penetrate deep into the respiratory system, posing significant human health risks. • • Over 20 polymer types have been identified in atmospheric samples, with textiles, tire wear, and dust as major contributors; this chemical diversity complicates source apportionment and necessitates polymer-specific risk assessments. • • Sampling methods are categorized as passive or active; active sampling is essential for quantifying deposition fluxes, yet no standardized protocol exists, leading to data incomparability across studies. • • Analytical techniques include μ-FTIR, μ-Raman, LDIR, and mass spectrometry; each has detection limits and resolution trade-offs, and method selection critically influences reported concentrations and polymer distributions.