SinoGreenTech Academic Portal
Official PDF TranslationJournal of Environmental Engineering Technology

Environmental Impact and Cost Analysis of Ecological Buffer Zones from an LCA-LCC Perspective

Authors: SHI Wanxian; XIONG Lijun; GUO Fei; LEI Jingcheng; XU Kangning

DOI: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202606004Status: Verified Translated Edition
Sponsored AdvertisementAd Placement Area
reCAPTCHA Bot Shield Active

Preparing Secure Academic Download

Verifying human reader & generating high-resolution document...

Verifying Document Integrity15s remaining
← Back to Article
Protected by Google reCAPTCHA v3.PrivacyTerms
Sponsored ContentAdSense In-Feed Ad Slot

Key Findings in This Report

• • Constructed wetlands achieve the lowest comprehensive cost at ¥1.01 yuan/m³ and exhibit the lowest environmental load across most impact categories, with only slightly higher land resource consumption intensity, making them the preferred environmental-economic option for non-point source pollution control. • • Ecological intercepting ditches show moderate comprehensive cost (¥1.57 yuan/m³) but higher impacts in metal resource consumption (54.60% contribution from rebar) and other categories due to rebar and base fertilizer inputs, indicating a need to optimize material selection. • • Vegetation restoration projects have the highest comprehensive cost (¥61.14 yuan/m³) and the most significant environmental impacts, with human carcinogenic toxicity elevated, primarily driven by concrete use (73.73% contribution) and base fertilizer, highlighting the environmental burden of concrete-intensive engineering. • • Life cycle environmental costs dominate total costs across all three measures, accounting for 77.83% (constructed wetlands), 92.80% (ecological intercepting ditches), and 90.98% (vegetation restoration) of comprehensive costs, underscoring the necessity of integrating full life cycle environmental impacts into decision-making for watershed restoration projects.