SinoGreenTech Academic Portal
Official PDF TranslationJournal of Environmental Engineering Technology

Energy Balance and Economic Analysis of Multi-Source Sewage Sludge Drying and Incineration

Authors: XU Peng; LU Yicheng

DOI: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202608022Status: Verified Translated Edition
Sponsored AdvertisementAd Placement Area
reCAPTCHA Bot Shield Active

Preparing Secure Academic Download

Verifying human reader & generating high-resolution document...

Verifying Document Integrity15s remaining
← Back to Article
Protected by Google reCAPTCHA v3.PrivacyTerms
Sponsored ContentAdSense In-Feed Ad Slot

Key Findings in This Report

• • Deep dewatering to 65% moisture reduces total process cost by 5.2% (from 2350 to 2277 CNY/t DS) and carbon emissions by 20.5% (from 892.5 to 709.1 kg CO2/t DS) compared to conventional dewatering to 76% moisture, despite higher dewatering costs (700 vs. 252 CNY/t DS operating cost). • • Sludge with higher organic content (65%) and lower moisture (70%) achieves negative auxiliary energy consumption (-1.77 t steam/t DS) and lower unit processing cost (1134 CNY/t DS) versus lower organic content (50%) and higher moisture (80%) sludge requiring 1.85 t steam/t DS and costing 2001 CNY/t DS. • • Transport cost is halved when sludge moisture decreases from 76% to 65% (313 vs. 229 CNY/t DS) due to reduced mass, directly impacting logistics economics. • • Carbon emissions from sludge drying and incineration dominate the full-process footprint, with steam consumption contributing 343.8 kg CO2/t DS for conventional dewatering versus 290.1 kg CO2/t DS for deep dewatering, while electricity consumption is lower for deep dewatering (168.8 vs. 262.4 kg CO2/t DS).