SinoGreenTech Academic Portal
Official PDF TranslationChinese Journal of Environmental Engineering

Comparative Carbon Emission Assessment of Waste Plastic Valorization Pathways

Authors: ZHOU Xiaochao; ZHANG Yuanyuan; XU Jiayu; ZHANG Tingting

DOI: 10.12030/j.cjee.202509053Status: Verified Translated Edition
Sponsored AdvertisementAd Placement Area
reCAPTCHA Bot Shield Active

Preparing Secure Academic Download

Verifying human reader & generating high-resolution document...

Verifying Document Integrity15s remaining
← Back to Article
Protected by Google reCAPTCHA v3.PrivacyTerms
Sponsored ContentAdSense In-Feed Ad Slot

Key Findings in This Report

• • Pyrolysis achieves the highest carbon offset of -3,024 kgCO2e per tonne of waste plastic, resulting in a net negative carbon footprint of -2,592 kgCO2e, making it the most effective route for climate mitigation. • • Mechanical recycling attains an 88% material recovery rate and a net carbon offset of -991.4 kgCO2e per tonne, but faces technical bottlenecks in sorting efficiency and product quality stability. • • Direct incineration exhibits the highest net carbon emission at 1,104 kgCO2e per tonne, underscoring its environmental disadvantage compared to chemical and mechanical recycling. • • Alcoholysis provides a net carbon emission of -259.5 kgCO2e per tonne, indicating moderate carbon reduction potential, while co-coking and solid fuel production yield net positive emissions of 185.8 and 115.4 kgCO2e, respectively.